Abstract
The aim was to discuss the right to health, opposing collective health to individual health and analyzing the impact of judicialization on the Unified Health System (SUS). To this end, it addresses the right to health, presenting its concept and minimum content; discusses the principle of integrality; discusses the judicial control of public policies, carrying out a balance between the reserve of the possible and the existential minimum; and defends the prioritization of public policies that benefit the community. As a methodology, bibliographic research was adopted from the literary review in books, articles and legislation that are dedicated to the theme in order to seek solutions to reduce expenses with judicialization.